Griffin v. State
78 So. 424, 16 Ala. App. 414, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 92
Opinion
The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of violating what is commonly known as the tick law. This appeal is on the record, and the material questions involved are identical with those passed upon and considered by this court at its present term in the case of Childs v. State, 78 South. 308. 1 Under the authority of that case, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
1
Ante, p. 392.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffin v. State, 78 So. 424, 16 Ala. App. 414, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 92 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).
78 So. 424 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henderson v. U. S. Discount Corp.
150 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Tyler v. Tyler
108 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Lamson v. Martin
104 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Estate Realty Corp. v. Taubel
154 So. 222 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Burgess v. Wirt
108 So. 169 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Schaefer v. Voyle
102 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
McCook v. Caruthers
99 So. 559 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Smith v. Dowling
89 So. 315 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Travis v. Travis
87 So. 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Boyd v. Gosser
82 So. 758 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)