Griffin v. Smyly

30 S.E. 416, 105 Ga. 475, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 567
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 1, 1898·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. In a case admitting of doubt as to whether there should be a verdict, or a judgment should be entered without a verdict, a judgment rendered upon a verdict is not, after the expiration of the term, open to collateral attach as being void. See Crow v. American Mortgage Co., 92 Ga. 815, and cases cited.

2. It is too late after judgment to avail one’s self of defenses which might have been made before its rendition. In such cases equity will not relieve the defendant of the consequences of his own laches.

8. There was no abuse of discretion in denying the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Oobb, J., absent. T. L. Bishop and J. A. Wimpy, for plaintiff. Reed & Hartsfield, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Smyly, 30 S.E. 416, 105 Ga. 475, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 567 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 416 (Griffin v. Smyly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howth v. Taliaferro
289 S.W. 119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Freeman v. Bank of LaFayette
93 S.E. 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bouvier-Iaeger Coal Land Co. v. Sypher
186 F. 644 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia, 1910)
Latimer v. Irish-American Bank
47 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Bush v. Bank of Thomasville
36 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)