Griffin v. Shandles
This text of 671 F. App'x 60 (Griffin v. Shandles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[61]*61Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raymond Griffin appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) review, Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Griffin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Griffin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. See Griffin v. Shandies, No. 5:15-ct-03145-D, 2016 WL 715753 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016; May 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-shandles-ca4-2016.