Griffin v. Shandles

671 F. App'x 60
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6945
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 60 (Griffin v. Shandles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Shandles, 671 F. App'x 60 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

[61]*61Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Griffin appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) review, Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Griffin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Griffin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. See Griffin v. Shandies, No. 5:15-ct-03145-D, 2016 WL 715753 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016; May 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-shandles-ca4-2016.