Griffin v. Shandles

Fourth Circuit

Griffin v. Shandles

671 F. App'x 60

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6945·Published

Opinion

[61] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Griffin appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) review, Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Griffin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Griffin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. See Griffin v. Shandies, No. 5:15-ct-03145-D, 2016 WL 715753 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016; May 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[61] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Griffin appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) review, Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Griffin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Griffin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. See Griffin v. Shandies, No. 5:15-ct-03145-D, 2016 WL 715753 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016; May 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Griffin v. Shandles, 671 F. App'x 60 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 60 (Griffin v. Shandles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related