Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.

196 S.E. 408, 185 Ga. 726, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 502
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 1938
DocketNo. 12136
StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E. 408 (Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Securities Investment Co., 196 S.E. 408, 185 Ga. 726, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 502 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

An assessment by the superintendent of banks on shares of stock in an insolvent bank, the shares having in his lifetime been in the name of the decedent, is not a debt within the meaning of the Code, § 113-1506, which declares: "If the estate shall have been distributed to the heirs at law without notice of an existing debt, the creditor may compel them to contribute pro rata to the payment of the debt.” State Banking Co. v. Hinton, 178 Ga. 68 (172 S. E. 42). Accordingly it was error to refuse to sustain the demurrer to the petition seeking to compel payment, out of property which had been delivered to the heirs at law, of an execution issued upon such assessment. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Bell, J., concurs in the judgment. Maddox & Griffin, for plaintiffs in error. Wright & Covington, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Banking Company v. Hinton
172 S.E. 42 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 S.E. 408, 185 Ga. 726, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-securities-investment-co-ga-1938.