Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.
This text of 196 S.E. 408 (Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An assessment by the superintendent of banks on shares of stock in an insolvent bank, the shares having in his lifetime been in the name of the decedent, is not a debt within the meaning of the Code, § 113-1506, which declares: "If the estate shall have been distributed to the heirs at law without notice of an existing debt, the creditor may compel them to contribute pro rata to the payment of the debt.” State Banking Co. v. Hinton, 178 Ga. 68 (172 S. E. 42). Accordingly it was error to refuse to sustain the demurrer to the petition seeking to compel payment, out of property which had been delivered to the heirs at law, of an execution issued upon such assessment. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E. 408, 185 Ga. 726, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-securities-investment-co-ga-1938.