Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Fed. Cl. 101
United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 19, 2018·No. 17-707·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-707V (not to be published)

************************* WILLIE GRIFFIN, * * Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * Filed: August 3, 2018 * v. * * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Chronic AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Inflammatory Demyelinating * Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Respondent. * * *************************

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA for Petitioner.

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On May 30, 2017, Willie Griffin filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”).2 Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), as a result of his October 1, 2014, Influenza (“flu”) vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that he has experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision in its present form will be available. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s CIDP or any other injury. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation (filed on August 3, 2018) that the issues before them could be settled, and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

 A lump sum of $180,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

Stipulation ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a) of the Act.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

WILLIE GRIFFIN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 17-707V ) Special Master Brian Corcoran SECRETARY OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner Willie Griffin (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt

of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

“Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on or about October 1, 2014.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused him to develop Chronic Inflammatory

Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) and that he experienced residual effects of this injury

for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged CIDP or any

other injury or his current condition. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $180,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject

to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

2 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a