Griffin v. New York City Department of Correction
This text of 179 A.D.2d 585 (Griffin v. New York City Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the matter was improperly transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), it must be dismissed. When an employee chooses to appeal a disciplinary determination to the Civil Service Commission pursuant to Civil Service Law § 76, substantial evidence and arbitrary and capricious standards of review are not applicable; neither is the penalty subject to review (Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 78 NY2d 318, 323). Under Civil Service Law § 76 (3), the Commission’s determination is "final and conclusive,” making judicial review available only if a constitutional right is implicated, or the agency has acted illegally, unconstitutionally, or in excess of its jurisdiction. Such is not the case here. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-new-york-city-department-of-correction-nyappdiv-1992.