Griffin v. Murdock
This text of 34 A. 30 (Griffin v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The count specially demurred to in this case, combines in one all the money counts, with one for goods sold and delivered, work and labor and an account stated. It is in [258]*258the form which has Jong been in use, and is commonly called an omnibus count. It is indorsed by Mr. Chittyin his work on Pleading, vol. 1, pp. 343, 349 ; and the form of the count given by him in vol. 3, p. 89, is substantially the same as the one under consideration. It was approved in Webber v. Tivill, 2 Saunders, 122, and was held good by this court in Cape Elizabeth v. Lombard, 70 Maine, 400. It has been sustained-by practice and authority for so long a time, that it must now bo considered settled and at rest.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 30, 88 Me. 254, 1896 Me. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-murdock-me-1896.