Griffin v. Medtronic
This text of Griffin v. Medtronic (Griffin v. Medtronic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED: May 27, 1997
PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-1219
Catherine W. Griffin,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
Medtronic, Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
On April 30, 1996, this court affirmed in part and reversed in
part the district court's opinion granting Medtronic, Inc.'s motion
for summary judgment. See Griffin v. Medtronic, Inc., 82 F.3d 79 (4th Cir. 1996). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated
this court's judgment for further consideration in light of
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 2240 (1996). See Griffin v. Medtronic, Inc. , ___ U.S. ___, 117 S. Ct. 939 (1997).
Expressing no opinion on the ultimate decision, and after re-
viewing Lohr and, as well, our decision in Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-
Squibb Co., 103 F.3d 324 (4th Cir. 1996), another case remanded to us in view of Lohr, we think it better to remand as to each of the
five counts in the Griffin complaint, as named on page two of our
slip opinion in this case, and to require their reconsideration
under Lohr and Duvall, supra. It is so ORDERED.
Entered at the direction of Senior Judge Michael, with the
concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Motz.
______________________________ CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Griffin v. Medtronic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-medtronic-ca4-1997.