Griffin v. Medtronic

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 1997·No. 94-1219·Published

Opinion

FILED: May 27, 1997

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-1219

Catherine W. Griffin, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Medtronic, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.

O R D E R

On April 30, 1996, this court affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's opinion granting Medtronic, Inc.'s motion

for summary judgment. See Griffin v. Medtronic, Inc., 82 F.3d 79 (4th Cir. 1996). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated

this court's judgment for further consideration in light of

Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 2240 (1996). See Griffin v. Medtronic, Inc. , ___ U.S. ___, 117 S. Ct. 939 (1997).

Expressing no opinion on the ultimate decision, and after re-

viewing Lohr and, as well, our decision in Duvall v. Bristol-Myers- Squibb Co., 103 F.3d 324 (4th Cir. 1996), another case remanded to us in view of Lohr, we think it better to remand as to each of the five counts in the Griffin complaint, as named on page two of our slip opinion in this case, and to require their reconsideration

under Lohr and Duvall, supra.

It is so ORDERED.

Entered at the direction of Senior Judge Michael, with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Motz.

CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Medtronic, (4th Cir. 1997).

Griffin v. Medtronic (Griffin v. Medtronic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related