Griffin v. Maryland

384 U.S. 893
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 13, 1966·No. 289, Misc·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the consent of the Attorney General of Maryland, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The motion to remand is also granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its decisions in Schowgurow v. Maryland, 240 Md. 121, 213 A. 2d 475, and Smith v. Maryland, 240 Md. 464, 214 A. 2d 563. This disposition of the case is without prejudice to any other questions presented by the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Maryland, 384 U.S. 893 (1966).

384 U.S. 893 (Griffin v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryon v. State
349 A.2d 393 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Carter v. State
337 A.2d 415 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Mason v. State
305 A.2d 492 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1973)
Butina v. State
242 A.2d 819 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1968)
Sterling v. State
235 A.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)