Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co.

206 So. 2d 210, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2373

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 24, 1968·No. No. 36579·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, [211]*211F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, [211]*211F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co., 206 So. 2d 210, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2373 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

206 So. 2d 210 (Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related