Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co.

206 So. 2d 210, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2373
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1968
DocketNo. 36579
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 So. 2d 210 (Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. M R & R Trucking Co., 206 So. 2d 210, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2373 (Fla. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, [211]*211F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Hook v. Blanton
206 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 So. 2d 210, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-m-r-r-trucking-co-fla-1968.