Griffin v. Jeffers

5 D.C. 444

Opinion

And the Court

(Thruston, J.,

absent,) gave the instruction as prayed.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $97.93.

Mr. Lee moved for a new trial on the ground of misdirection of the jury, and cited the ease of Gracy v. Bailee, 16 Sergeant & R. 126, abridged in 1 Wheeler, 170.

But the Court overruled the motion.

Judgment for plaintiff.

See Harrison v. Rowan, 3 Wash. C. C. R. 580; Blight v. Ashley, 1 Peters, C. C. Rep. 15; Beall v. Davis, in this Court, at December term, 1826; Coote & Jones v. Bank of the United States, in this Court, at the same term (3 Cranch, C. C. 50); and Smith & Son v. Coleman et al. in this Court, at Washington, April term, 1821, (2 Cranch, C. C. 237.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Jeffers, 5 D.C. 444 (circtddc 1838).

5 D.C. 444 (Griffin v. Jeffers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Coleman
22 F. Cas. 488 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1821)
Coote v. Bank of the United States
6 F. Cas. 492 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1820)