Griffin v. Hammock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griffin v. Hammock

66 A.D.2d 848, 411 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 26, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 848 (Griffin v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffin v. Hammock, 66 A.D.2d 848, 411 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Board of Parole which set a minimum sentence of three years, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 17, 1977, which denied his application. Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Board of Parole which fixed his minimum sentence at three years (see Correction Law, former §212 [repealed by L 1977, ch 904, §2]). However, petitioner has since been released on parole and therefore any decision by this court would necessarily be academic (see Matter of La Croix v Olgiati, 60 AD2d 652). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Board of Parole which set a minimum sentence of three years, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 17, 1977, which denied his application. Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Board of Parole which fixed his minimum sentence at three years (see Correction Law, former §212 [repealed by L 1977, ch 904, §2]). However, petitioner has since been released on parole and therefore any decision by this court would necessarily be academic (see Matter of La Croix v Olgiati, 60 AD2d 652). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 848, 411 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-hammock-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack