Griffin v. Griffin

982 S.W.2d 788, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2214, 1998 WL 870936
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 1998
DocketED 73562
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 982 S.W.2d 788 (Griffin v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Griffin, 982 S.W.2d 788, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2214, 1998 WL 870936 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Anthony Griffin, appeals from a judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to wife, Geraldine Griffin, and distributing their marital property. We dismiss the appeal because husband’s notice of appeal was untimely filed.

Although neither party raises the issue of timeliness of this appeal, we must address the question of appellate jurisdiction sua sponte. Committee for Educational Equality v. State, 878 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Mo. banc 1994). A timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement; if the notice of appeal is untimely, we are without jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Rogiers v. Boatmen’s Trust Co., 918 S.W.2d 285, 286 (Mo.App.1996).

Rule 81.04(a) provides that an appeal must be filed no later than ten days after the judgment becomes final. If no motion for new trial is filed, a judgment becomes final thirty days after it is entered by the trial court. Rule 81.05(a). The record in this case discloses that the judgment and decree *789 was filed on September 30, 1997. The judgment therefore became final on October 30, 1997. The notice of appeal was due by November 10, 1997 but was not filed until November 21, 1997. 1 We accordingly have no jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. We note that the notice of appeal states that an after trial motion was filed on October 7, 1997 and was decided on November 6, 1997. The after trial motion is not filed with this court and is not included in the minutes of the trial court as required by Rule 81.12(a). Even if an after trial motion was decided on November 6, 1997, the November 21 notice of appeal was untimely because it would have been due on November 17, 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denton v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
318 S.W.3d 274 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Kraus
318 S.W.3d 274 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Bi-State Development Agency
87 S.W.3d 279 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
D.A.D. v. J.B.D.
81 S.W.3d 2 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
In Re the Estate of Burg
68 S.W.3d 543 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
Swiney v. State
27 S.W.3d 498 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
Bailey v. Bailey
18 S.W.3d 553 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
River Salvage, Inc. v. King
11 S.W.3d 877 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 S.W.2d 788, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2214, 1998 WL 870936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-griffin-moctapp-1998.