Griffin v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griffin v. Doyle

72 A.D.3d 1084, 898 N.Y.S.2d 878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.3d 1084 (Griffin v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffin v. Doyle, 72 A.D.3d 1084, 898 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit any further proceedings in the matter entitled People v Griffin, pending in the County Court, Suffolk County, under indictment No. 08-00221, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

[1085]*1085Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic as a result of a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 5, 2009. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit any further proceedings in the matter entitled People v Griffin, pending in the County Court, Suffolk County, under indictment No. 08-00221, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the appeal as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

[1085]*1085Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic as a result of a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 5, 2009. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.3d 1084, 898 N.Y.S.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-doyle-nyappdiv-2010.