Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co.

113 So. 563, 93 Fla. 1104
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 9, 1927·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in this cause have been examined carefully. It involves two foreclosure proceedings, a bankruptcy proceeding together with other transactions including an account between appellant and appellee running over a period of years. Good lawyers may differ in their methods of handling the details of a labored litigation like this. The net result of these differences sometimes amounts to irregularities or even errors, but they are not ground for reversal in this State unless a miscarriage of justice in shown. We cannot see that an opinion discussing the various assignments of error would serve any useful purpose. The record considered as an entirety shows a just conclusion was reached. So the decree of the Chancellor is affirmed. Section 2812 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County; Amos Lewis, Judge.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co., 113 So. 563, 93 Fla. 1104 (Fla. 1927).

113 So. 563 (Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richards v. Samuel
184 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Izler v. Porter Slyke
115 So. 516 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)