Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co.

113 So. 563, 93 Fla. 1104
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 So. 563 (Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co., 113 So. 563, 93 Fla. 1104 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in this cause have been examined carefully. It involves two foreclosure proceedings, a bankruptcy proceeding together with other transactions including an account between appellant and appellee running over a period of years. Good lawyers may differ in their methods of handling the details of a labored litigation like this. The net result of these differences sometimes amounts to irregularities or even errors, but they are not ground for reversal in this State unless a miscarriage of justice in shown. We cannot see that an opinion discussing the various assignments of error would serve any useful purpose. The record considered as an entirety shows a just conclusion was reached. So the decree of the Chancellor is affirmed. Section 2812 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County; Amos Lewis, Judge.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. Samuel
184 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Izler v. Porter Slyke
115 So. 516 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 563, 93 Fla. 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-dothan-guano-co-fla-1927.