Griffin v. Carson Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Griffin v. Carson Naval Stores Co.

146 So. 187, 108 Fla. 245

DecidedFebruary 8, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 187 (Griffin v. Carson Naval Stores Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffin v. Carson Naval Stores Co., 146 So. 187, 108 Fla. 245 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an ejectment suit in which the defense was adverse possession. The case was submitted to the jury which found for the plaintiff. The trial judge sustained the jury’s finding as to all the land included in the jury’s verdict, except one parcel which plaintiff was required to remit from his judgment or suffer a new trial. Remittur was entered and the motion for new trial denied.

. The record has been carefully examined and no reversible errors have been found. The jury settled the facts, and there is no sufficient showing here to warrant the setting aside of the verdict, by reversal of the judgment in the appellate court. Therefore the judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an ejectment suit in which the defense was adverse possession. The case was submitted to the jury which found for the plaintiff. The trial judge sustained the jury’s finding as to all the land included in the jury’s verdict, except one parcel which plaintiff was required to remit from his judgment or suffer a new trial. Remittur was entered and the motion for new trial denied.

. The record has been carefully examined and no reversible errors have been found. The jury settled the facts, and there is no sufficient showing here to warrant the setting aside of the verdict, by reversal of the judgment in the appellate court. Therefore the judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 187, 108 Fla. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-carson-naval-stores-co-fla-1933.