Griffin v. Buffington

Supreme Court of Georgia

Griffin v. Buffington

128 S.E.2d 727, 218 Ga. 488, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 541

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 8, 1962

Docket21806

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E.2d 727 (Griffin v. Buffington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griffin v. Buffington, 128 S.E.2d 727, 218 Ga. 488, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 541 (Ga. 1962).

Pincite

Opinions

Mobley, Justice.

1. The exception is to a judgment sustaining general and special demurrers to plaintiff’s petition seeking money damages for and temporary and permanent injunction against alleged continuing trespasses by defendants upon land alleged to be owned by plaintiff. The petition adequately describes the land. By special and general demurrers defendants seek to require plaintiff to allege a legal description of the exact portion of the land upon which it is alleged that the trespasses are being committed. Upon plaintiff’s failure to amend to give such a description, the trial court dismissed the petition.

2. Where, as here, in an action seeking to enjoin continuing trespasses upon land plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of a certain adequately described tract of land upon which defendants are trespassing, the petition is not subject to special or general demurrers because of plaintiff’s failure to further allege an adequate description of the exact portion of the land trespassed upon, such description of the exact portion being unnecessary for the reason that the court may enter judgment enjoining defendants from trespassing upon the entire described tract, which judgment can be enforced without a description of the particular portion being trespassed upon. [489]*489Buffington v. Carter, 199 Ga. 811 (2) (35 SE2d 440); Miller v. Stewart, 202 Ga. 127 (1) (42 SE2d 445); Turner v. Boyd, 212 Ga. 191, 192 (1) (91 SE2d 502); Moss v. Thomson Co., 212 Ga. 184, 185 (1) (91 SE2d 485).

Submitted October 8, 1962 Decided November 8, 1962 Rehearing denied December 3, 1962. J. Robert Cooper, Wheeler, Robinson & Thompson, for plaintiff in error. Oliver .& Bostick, John H. Smith, R. Wilson Smith, Jr. contra.

3. The court erred in sustaining the special and general demurrers and dismissing plaintiff’s petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mobley, Justice.

1. The exception is to a judgment sustaining general and special demurrers to plaintiff’s petition seeking money damages for and temporary and permanent injunction against alleged continuing trespasses by defendants upon land alleged to be owned by plaintiff. The petition adequately describes the land. By special and general demurrers defendants seek to require plaintiff to allege a legal description of the exact portion of the land upon which it is alleged that the trespasses are being committed. Upon plaintiff’s failure to amend to give such a description, the trial court dismissed the petition.

2. Where, as here, in an action seeking to enjoin continuing trespasses upon land plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of a certain adequately described tract of land upon which defendants are trespassing, the petition is not subject to special or general demurrers because of plaintiff’s failure to further allege an adequate description of the exact portion of the land trespassed upon, such description of the exact portion being unnecessary for the reason that the court may enter judgment enjoining defendants from trespassing upon the entire described tract, which judgment can be enforced without a description of the particular portion being trespassed upon. [489]*489Buffington v. Carter, 199 Ga. 811 (2) (35 SE2d 440); Miller v. Stewart, 202 Ga. 127 (1) (42 SE2d 445); Turner v. Boyd, 212 Ga. 191, 192 (1) (91 SE2d 502); Moss v. Thomson Co., 212 Ga. 184, 185 (1) (91 SE2d 485).

Submitted October 8, 1962 Decided November 8, 1962 Rehearing denied December 3, 1962. J. Robert Cooper, Wheeler, Robinson & Thompson, for plaintiff in error. Oliver .& Bostick, John H. Smith, R. Wilson Smith, Jr. contra.

3. The court erred in sustaining the special and general demurrers and dismissing plaintiff’s petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 S.E.2d 727, 218 Ga. 488, 1962 Ga. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-buffington-ga-1962.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack