Griffenberg v. The John Laughlin
11 F. Cas. 4, 2 W.N.C. 612, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142
Opinion
Whether there was a lien under the Pennsylvania statute is an immaterial question, because the demand is not for maritime supplies, and if it had been the place of supply would have been the home port of the vessel. The demand arose before she was equipped so as to be' in a condition to receive “supplies” in the distinctive sense of that word. The libel is dismissed. for want of jurisdiction, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griffenberg v. The John Laughlin, 11 F. Cas. 4, 2 W.N.C. 612, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142 (E.D. Pa. 1876).
11 F. Cas. 4 (Griffenberg v. The John Laughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.