Griffel v. Belfer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griffel v. Belfer

19 A.D.2d 807, 243 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3154

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Griffel v. Belfer. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 A.D.2d 609 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1963·Published

Opinion

Orders, entered on February 15, 1963, modifying the notices of examinations before trial of plaintiffs and denying the cross motions, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. The communications between the deceased Jacob Griffel and Mr. Berman during the bedside conference of May 31, 1953 were not confidential and not within the attorney-client privilege. On the present record the material sought from the other lawyers would seem to be protected by the confidential privilege. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, entered on February 15, 1963, modifying the notices of examinations before trial of plaintiffs and denying the cross motions, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. The communications between the deceased Jacob Griffel and Mr. Berman during the bedside conference of May 31, 1953 were not confidential and not within the attorney-client privilege. On the present record the material sought from the other lawyers would seem to be protected by the confidential privilege. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Griffel v. Belfer, 19 A.D.2d 807, 243 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

19 A.D.2d 807 (Griffel v. Belfer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.