Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Feng Li (In re Feng Li)

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Feng Li (In re Feng Li)

92 N.E.3d 1239, 69 N.Y.S.3d 849, 30 N.Y.3d 1082

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided January 16, 2018·No. 2017–933·Published

Opinion

On the Court's own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513[a] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); appeal, insofar as taken from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court's own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513[a] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); appeal, insofar as taken from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it is untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b] ; Eaton v. State of New York , 76 N.Y.2d 824 [1990] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Feng Li (In re Feng Li), 92 N.E.3d 1239, 69 N.Y.S.3d 849, 30 N.Y.3d 1082 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

Pincite

92 N.E.3d 1239 (Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Feng Li (In re Feng Li)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related