Grievance Adm'r v. Shirvell

Michigan Supreme Court

Grievance Adm'r v. Shirvell

921 N.W.2d 747

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 2019

DocketSC: 158309

StatusPublished

This text of 921 N.W.2d 747 (Grievance Adm'r v. Shirvell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grievance Adm'r v. Shirvell, 921 N.W.2d 747 (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon de novo review by the entire Court in accordance with MCR 2.003(D)(2)(b), the Court orders that respondent's motion to disqualify Justice Elizabeth T. Clement from participating in the decision of this case is DENIED for the reason that respondent has not alleged facts establishing an appearance of impropriety or a serious risk of actual bias from her participation in the case. MCR 2.003(C)(1)(b).

CLEMENT , J., did not participate in the decision on this disqualification motion.

CAVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon de novo review by the entire Court in accordance with MCR 2.003(D)(2)(b), the Court orders that respondent's motion to disqualify Justice Elizabeth T. Clement from participating in the decision of this case is DENIED for the reason that respondent has not alleged facts establishing an appearance of impropriety or a serious risk of actual bias from her participation in the case. MCR 2.003(C)(1)(b).

CLEMENT , J., did not participate in the decision on this disqualification motion.

CAVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 N.W.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grievance-admr-v-shirvell-mich-2019.