Grievance Administrator v. Toca

Michigan Supreme Court

Grievance Administrator v. Toca

765 N.W.2d 612, 2009 WL 1562979

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 2009·No. 138947·Published

Opinion

765 N.W.2d 612 (2009)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 138947.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 3, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is *613 DISMISSED, because the respondent has not been aggrieved "by a final order of discipline or dismissal" entered by the Attorney Discipline Board. MCR 9.122(A)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

765 N.W.2d 612 (2009)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 138947.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 3, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is *613 DISMISSED, because the respondent has not been aggrieved "by a final order of discipline or dismissal" entered by the Attorney Discipline Board. MCR 9.122(A)(1).

Grievance Administrator v. Toca, 765 N.W.2d 612, 2009 WL 1562979 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

765 N.W.2d 612 (Grievance Administrator v. Toca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Order

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.