Grievance Administrator v. Toca

Michigan Supreme Court

Grievance Administrator v. Toca

765 N.W.2d 612, 2009 WL 1562979

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 3, 2009

Docket138947

StatusPublished

This text of 765 N.W.2d 612 (Grievance Administrator v. Toca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grievance Administrator v. Toca, 765 N.W.2d 612, 2009 WL 1562979 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

765 N.W.2d 612 (2009)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 138947.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 3, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is *613 DISMISSED, because the respondent has not been aggrieved "by a final order of discipline or dismissal" entered by the Attorney Discipline Board. MCR 9.122(A)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

765 N.W.2d 612 (2009)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 138947.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 3, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is *613 DISMISSED, because the respondent has not been aggrieved "by a final order of discipline or dismissal" entered by the Attorney Discipline Board. MCR 9.122(A)(1).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 N.W.2d 612, 2009 WL 1562979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grievance-administrator-v-toca-mich-2009.

Opinion

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Order

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Frederick M. TOCA, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.