Grievance Administrator v. Susan F Widenbaum

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2012·No. 145418·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 145418 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, Justices GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee, v SC: 145418 ADB: 10-126-GA SUSAN F. WIDENBAUM, Respondent-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA, J., would grant leave to appeal.

HATHAWAY, J., not participating because she has a professional relationship with a member of a law firm involved in this matter.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 5, 2012 _________________________________________ s1128 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grievance Administrator v. Susan F Widenbaum, (Mich. 2012).

Grievance Administrator v. Susan F Widenbaum (Grievance Administrator v. Susan F Widenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.