Grievance Administrator v. Cote

767 N.W.2d 449, 483 Mich. 1130
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 2009·No. 138313·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Summary Disposition July 9, 2009:

The application for leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the March 6, 2009, order of the Attorney Disciplinary Board and we remand this case to the Attorney Disciplinary Board for consideration as on reconsideration granted. The board should reconsider its vacation of conditions A through D of the hearing panel’s June 25, 2008, order of suspension in light of the documentation provided by the Grievance Administrator. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. ADB: 07-83-GA.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grievance Administrator v. Cote, 767 N.W.2d 449, 483 Mich. 1130 (Mich. 2009).

767 N.W.2d 449 (Grievance Administrator v. Cote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. Oakland County
767 N.W.2d 449 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)