Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Grievance Administrator v. Chappell

Grievance Administrator v. Chappell

344 N.W.2d 1, 418 Mich. 1202, 1984 Mich. LEXIS 1376
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 1984
DocketDocket No. 72823
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 344 N.W.2d 1 (Grievance Administrator v. Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grievance Administrator v. Chappell, 344 N.W.2d 1, 418 Mich. 1202, 1984 Mich. LEXIS 1376 (Mich. 1984).

Opinion

Pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the order of the Attorney Discipline Board dated September 30, 1983, is modified to the extent that it bars the respondent during his period of suspension from working as an "agent, clerk or employee” of a licensed attorney. Insofar as those activities do not require a license to practice law in Michigan, prohibiting respondent from engaging in those activities as a part of his suspension exceeds the board’s power of suspension pursuant to GCR 1963, 955(2). In all other respects leave to appeal is denied.

Williams, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mitchell
560 N.W.2d 600 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1997)
Department of Social Services v. Hatcher
443 Mich. 426 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1993)
In Re Hatcher
505 N.W.2d 834 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1993)
In Re Ronald T. Mitchell, Esq. In Re Stafford A. Hilaire, Esq
901 F.2d 1179 (Third Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 N.W.2d 1, 418 Mich. 1202, 1984 Mich. LEXIS 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grievance-administrator-v-chappell-mich-1984.