Grievance Administrator v. Baker

783 N.W.2d 119, 486 Mich. 1040, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1164
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2010·No. 140619·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

783 N.W.2d 119 (2010)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dianne L. BAKER, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket No. 140619.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 25, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CORRIGAN and YOUNG, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

WEAVER, J., not participating. I abstain from voting on any items dealing with the Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) and/or the Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) to avoid any appearance that I could be trying to affect the outcome of the referrals of me to the JTC and AGC by Justices Corrigan, Young and Markman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grievance Administrator v. Baker, 783 N.W.2d 119, 486 Mich. 1040, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1164 (Mich. 2010).

783 N.W.2d 119 (Grievance Administrator v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McCauley
783 N.W.2d 119 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)