Grievance Administrator v. Arnold D Dunchock

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 7, 2011·No. 142795·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 7, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

142795 & (17) Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Brian K. Zahra, Petitioner-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 142795 ADB: 09-000051-GA ARNOLD D. DUNCHOCK, Respondent-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay or reinstatement is DENIED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 7, 2011 _________________________________________ p0906 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grievance Administrator v. Arnold D Dunchock, (Mich. 2011).

Grievance Administrator v. Arnold D Dunchock (Grievance Administrator v. Arnold D Dunchock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.