Griessman v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griessman v. Fisher

225 A.D. 874

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Order dismissing eomplaiht for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While we disapprove of the conduct of defendant in entertaining jurisdiction of this case, we do not think he was legally disqualified. (People ex rel. Cooper v. Sheriff of the County of Washington, 208 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents upon the ground that the complaining witness in a criminal prosecution is a party to the controversy within the meaning of section 15 of the Judiciary Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing eomplaiht for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While we disapprove of the conduct of defendant in entertaining jurisdiction of this case, we do not think he was legally disqualified. (People ex rel. Cooper v. Sheriff of the County of Washington, 208 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents upon the ground that the complaining witness in a criminal prosecution is a party to the controversy within the meaning of section 15 of the Judiciary Law.

Griessman v. Fisher, 225 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

225 A.D. 874 (Griessman v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related