Griesheimer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griesheimer v. State

682 So. 2d 677, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11627, 1996 WL 637684

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 6, 1996

DocketNos. 95-2524, 95-2525

StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 677 (Griesheimer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griesheimer v. State, 682 So. 2d 677, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11627, 1996 WL 637684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the cross-appeal as well as the conviction which is the subject of the main appeal. Appellant, however, was deprived of notice of his right to contest the public defender fees and costs; therefore, we reverse that part of his sentence and remand with direction to proceed in accordance with Wilkins v. State, 668 So.2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the cross-appeal as well as the conviction which is the subject of the main appeal. Appellant, however, was deprived of notice of his right to contest the public defender fees and costs; therefore, we reverse that part of his sentence and remand with direction to proceed in accordance with Wilkins v. State, 668 So.2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 So. 2d 677, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11627, 1996 WL 637684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griesheimer-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack