Griesheimer v. State
682 So. 2d 677, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11627, 1996 WL 637684
Opinion
We affirm the cross-appeal as well as the conviction which is the subject of the main appeal. Appellant, however, was deprived of notice of his right to contest the public defender fees and costs; therefore, we reverse that part of his sentence and remand with direction to proceed in accordance with Wilkins v. State, 668 So.2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griesheimer v. State, 682 So. 2d 677, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11627, 1996 WL 637684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
682 So. 2d 677 (Griesheimer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilkins v. State
668 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)