Griesemer v. Knox Hat Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griesemer v. Knox Hat Manufacturing Co.

173 A.D. 910

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

—Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the 'grounds that there was no substantial evidence to establish conspiracy as a defense, and that the trial court erred to the prejudice of the plaintiff in excluding the original answer and in refusing to permit the plaintiff to testify that in entering into the contract in suit he relied upon the apparent authority of the general manager, MacFarland, to make such contracts, as shown by his action in making previous like contracts. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the 'grounds that there was no substantial evidence to establish conspiracy as a defense, and that the trial court erred to the prejudice of the plaintiff in excluding the original answer and in refusing to permit the plaintiff to testify that in entering into the contract in suit he relied upon the apparent authority of the general manager, MacFarland, to make such contracts, as shown by his action in making previous like contracts. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Griesemer v. Knox Hat Manufacturing Co., 173 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 910 (Griesemer v. Knox Hat Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.