Grier v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.
225 A.D. 783
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1928·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. In affirming this judgment we are not to be taken as agreeing which the learned trial justice in the grounds given by him for his reduction of the amount of the verdict. We think the evidence in relation to epilepsy was properly received (Cross v. City of Syracuse, 200 N. Y. 393), and we affirm the order reducing the verdict on the ground that the same was excessive even with such evidence in the case. AH concur. Present — Clark, Sears, Taylor, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grier v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co., 225 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 783 (Grier v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cross v. . City of Syracuse
94 N.E. 184 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)