Grier v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.
This text of 225 A.D. 783 (Grier v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. In affirming this judgment we are not to be taken as agreeing which the learned trial justice in the grounds given by him for his reduction of the amount of the verdict. We think the evidence in relation to epilepsy was properly received (Cross v. City of Syracuse, 200 N. Y. 393), and we affirm the order reducing the verdict on the ground that the same was excessive even with such evidence in the case. AH concur. Present — Clark, Sears, Taylor, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grier-v-h-h-franklin-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1928.