Grier v. Fenty

13 Misc. 2d 542, 164 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2822
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 24, 1957·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issuance of a violation against the premises as such, and the landlord’s proof in relation thereto, was insufficient to establish illegality of this tenant’s occupancy. In any event, the condition was one created by the present landlord or his predecessor. Since the testimony disclosed that all that might be necessary was the approval of these alterations or the filing of plans pertaining thereto, the landlord could not maintain the proceeding except under section 51 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, by procuring a certificate of eviction.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grier v. Fenty, 13 Misc. 2d 542, 164 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

13 Misc. 2d 542 (Grier v. Fenty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonnell v. Sir Prize Contracting Corp.
32 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
K & G Co. v. Reyes
52 Misc. 2d 606 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1966)