Gridine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gridine v. State

93 So. 3d 360, 2012 WL 1929918, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8555

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 2012·No. No. 1D10-2517·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[361]*361On Motion for Kehearing and Certification

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and certification, we deny the motion for rehearing but grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.

We hereby certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN Graham, v. Florida, — U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PROHIBIT SENTENCING A FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD TO A PRISON SENTENCE OF SEVENTY YEARS FOR THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE MURDER?

WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[361]*361On Motion for Kehearing and Certification

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and certification, we deny the motion for rehearing but grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.

We hereby certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN Graham, v. Florida, — U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PROHIBIT SENTENCING A FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD TO A PRISON SENTENCE OF SEVENTY YEARS FOR THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE MURDER?

WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Gridine v. State, 93 So. 3d 360, 2012 WL 1929918, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8555 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

93 So. 3d 360 (Gridine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related