Grider v. State
This text of 398 S.W.2d 937 (Grider v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while his operator’s license was suspended under the provisions of Art. 6701h Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St.; the punishment, a fine of $125.
The statement of facts found in the record cannot be considered, it not having been filed in the trial court as required by Sec. 4 of Art. 759a Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. in effect at the time notice of appeal herein was given. Salyer v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.C. 532, 316 S.W.2d 420; Burrus v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 307 S.W.2d 91.
The complaint and information are sufficient under the holding of this Court in Adams v. State, 376 S.W.2d 832, to charge the offense defined in Section 5 of Art. 6701h V.A.C.S., the punishment for which is found in. Section 32(c) of said Article.
The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant’s motion to quash the information.
In the absence of a statement of •facts which we can consider, the question of whether there is a fatal variance between the allegations of' the indictment and the proof as to the ground upon which appellant’s operator’s license was suspended, and whether such suspension 'was under Art. 6687b V.A.C.S. rather than under. Art. 6701h V.A.C.S. is not before,us.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 S.W.2d 937, 1966 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grider-v-state-texcrimapp-1966.