Grice v. State

186 So. 3d 1113, 2016 WL 892612
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 2016
DocketNo. 4D15-2544
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 1113 (Grice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grice v. State, 186 So. 3d 1113, 2016 WL 892612 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Grice appeals an order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion which seeks additional jail credit. We affirm without prejudice for appellant to file a sworn and legally sufficient rule 3.801 motion to correct jail credit within sixty days of this opinion. See Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Casteel v. State
141 So. 3d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 1113, 2016 WL 892612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grice-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.