Grice v. Jones

1 Stew. 254
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of detinue, brought by Jones, as administrator, for a negro man, of the property of his intestate. The defendant plead the general issue, and the statute of limitations. To this last plea, the plaintiff replied, that the action was not barred at the death of his intestate, and had not been barred since he became administrator. To this replication the defendant demurred. The Circuit Court gave judgement for the plaintiff, sustaining his replication, and Grice assigns this as error.

When the statute of limitations begins to run, it will continue running, although a disability to sue may intervene. But by the equitable construction of the fourth section of the statute of 21 James I. it has been held that, where the action was not barred at the death of the testator. his executor shall be allowed twelve months from the time of his death to commence suit, although the bar would have attached before the year had elapsed. Our statute is similar in its terms, and should receive the same equitable construction. The replication does not shew what time elapsed between the death of the intestate and the institution of the suit; it may have been true, and vet no answer in law to the plea, it ought to have > " nvp.rr„1pfl o Decn overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice v. Jones, 1 Stew. 254 (Ala. 1827).

1 Stew. 254 (Grice v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pickett v. Hobdy
63 Ala. 609 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Corning v. Ludlum
28 N.J. Eq. 398 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1877)
Harwell v. Steel
17 Ala. 372 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)
Aikin v. Bailey
5 Ark. 580 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1850)
Cummins v. Colgin
3 Port. 393 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1836)