Grice v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital
This text of 570 F. App'x 539 (Grice v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kimberly Grice appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We review the district court’s determination de novo. See Keith v. Cnty. of Oakland, 703 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir.2013).
After carefully reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court’s judgment. The reasoning that supports the judgment was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and our issuance of a detailed written opinion would be unduly duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore af *540 firm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. See Grice v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp. Dist., 981 F.Supp.2d 719 (W.D.Tenn. 2013).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
570 F. App'x 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grice-v-jackson-madison-county-general-hospital-ca6-2014.