Gribbons v. Sowders

827 F.2d 769, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11455, 1987 WL 44492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 26, 1987
Docket86-6062
StatusUnpublished

This text of 827 F.2d 769 (Gribbons v. Sowders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gribbons v. Sowders, 827 F.2d 769, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11455, 1987 WL 44492 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

827 F.2d 769

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Howard GRIBBONS, Ronnie Whitmore and Tee Jay Pennington,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Dewey SOWDERS, Warden, Northpoint Training Center; Phillip
W. Parker Deputy Warden of Security at Northpoint;
et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6062

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

August 26, 1987.

Before KEITH, Circuit Judge, JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge, and DOWD*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellants appeal an order of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, denying them partial summary judgment and granting summary judgment to the defendants. Plaintiffs, presently inmates at the Northpoint Training Center in Burgin, Kentucky, claim that their rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated by a body cavity search undertaken by defendants, all of whom are prison system employees. The district court, in a memorandum opinion, dismissed the prisoners' claims, finding that the reason for the search--reports of illicit drug traffic in the prison facility--justified the prison employees' actions.

Without expressing any view on the validity of the search, we VACATE the district court order and REMAND the case for consideration of the plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment claim in light of Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1978) and for further consideration of their Fourteenth Amendment claim.

*

Honorable David D. Dowd, Jr., United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Wolfish
441 U.S. 520 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Friend (Michael)
827 F.2d 769 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
827 F.2d 769, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11455, 1987 WL 44492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gribbons-v-sowders-ca6-1987.