Gribbin v. Mygatt

281 A.D. 1034, 121 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment, respondent contends that appellant, a village police justice, had knowledge upon the arraignment that respondent had been arrested for violation of subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, not committed within the presence of the arresting officer, and that appellant altered official records. Order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. There is no claim that the arrest was not authorized by subdivision 5-e of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Against appellant’s showing of evidentiary facts, including facts established prima facie by official record, respondent has failed to carry the burden of showing facts sufficient to raise any triable issue. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gribbin v. Mygatt, 281 A.D. 1034, 121 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 1034 (Gribbin v. Mygatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rho Realty Corp. v. H-M-C Corp.
17 Misc. 2d 795 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Diamond v. Wasserman
14 Misc. 2d 781 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)