Gribben v. Hoare

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Gribben v. Hoare

54 Misc. 245, 104 N.Y.S. 445

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 54 Misc. 245 (Gribben v. Hoare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gribben v. Hoare, 54 Misc. 245, 104 N.Y.S. 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Seabury, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a complaint. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and the demurrer is upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The lien was filed by the plaintiff as a laborer against the defendant Hoare as subcontractor, the defendant Zimmerman as contractor and the defendant Gilder as owner of the premises for the improvement of which the labor of the plaintiff was performed. All of the defendants except Hoare demurred to the complaint and are respondents upon this appeal. Section 47 of the Lien Law provides that “In no case shall the owner be liable to pay, by reason of all liens created pursuant to this article, a sum greater than the value or agreed price of the labor and materials remaining unpaid at the time of filing notices of such liens.” Laws of 1897, chap. 418. The absence of any allegation in the complaint that any sum was due or remained unpaid from the owner to the contractor, or [246]*246from the contractor to the subcontractor, is fatal to the sufficiency of the complaint. Ball & Wood Co. v. Clark & Sons Co., 31 App. Div. 356; Siegel v. Ehrshowsky, 46 Misc. Rep. 605. The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained.

Gildersleeve and Brady, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seabury, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a complaint. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and the demurrer is upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The lien was filed by the plaintiff as a laborer against the defendant Hoare as subcontractor, the defendant Zimmerman as contractor and the defendant Gilder as owner of the premises for the improvement of which the labor of the plaintiff was performed. All of the defendants except Hoare demurred to the complaint and are respondents upon this appeal. Section 47 of the Lien Law provides that “In no case shall the owner be liable to pay, by reason of all liens created pursuant to this article, a sum greater than the value or agreed price of the labor and materials remaining unpaid at the time of filing notices of such liens.” Laws of 1897, chap. 418. The absence of any allegation in the complaint that any sum was due or remained unpaid from the owner to the contractor, or [246]*246from the contractor to the subcontractor, is fatal to the sufficiency of the complaint. Ball & Wood Co. v. Clark & Sons Co., 31 App. Div. 356; Siegel v. Ehrshowsky, 46 Misc. Rep. 605. The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained.

Gildersleeve and Brady, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Misc. 245, 104 N.Y.S. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gribben-v-hoare-nyappterm-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack