Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York
This text of 465 N.E.2d 1251 (Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in refusing to grant declaratory relief in this case (Bower & Gardner v Evans, 60 NY2d 781). Generally, a declaratory judgment action is not the proper vehicle to challenge an administrative procedure, where judicial review by way of article 78 proceeding is available.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 N.E.2d 1251, 62 N.Y.2d 763, 477 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 9011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greystone-mgmt-corp-v-conciliation-appeals-bd-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1984.