Greyson v. Reno

94 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37538, 1996 WL 467697
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 1996
Docket95-16970
StatusUnpublished

This text of 94 F.3d 651 (Greyson v. Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greyson v. Reno, 94 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37538, 1996 WL 467697 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

94 F.3d 651

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Malcolm GREYSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Janet RENO, United States Attorney General; Elliott Enoki,
Interim United States Attorney; Michael Kawahara, Assistant
U.S. Attorney; Robert Marks, State Attorney General; Keith
M. Kaneshiro, Prosecuting Attorney, City & County of
Honolulu; Guy Hall, Administrator, Oahu Community
Correctional Center; State of Hawaii, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-16970.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 16, 1996.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Malcolm Greyson, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 requesting that the United States Attorney General credit toward his federal sentence the time Greyson spent in state custody pursuant to a pre-trial federal detainer. As Greyson acknowledges in his brief, this appeal is now moot because the Bureau of Prisons credited Greyson's eighteen months of pre-trial "dead time" against his 151-month federal sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pens. Plan Guide P 23,926
94 F.3d 651 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F.3d 651, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37538, 1996 WL 467697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greyson-v-reno-ca9-1996.