Greyhound Corp. v. Coleman
This text of 103 N.E.2d 293 (Greyhound Corp. v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the Court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the appeal.
The record reveals that the order appealed from is one overruling a demurrer to the petition. Ths is not a final order from which an appeal may be prosecuted. National Guarantee & Finance Co. v. Russell, 25 Abs 483; Kelly v. Kelly, 74 Oh Ap 225. The appellant cites the case of Spencer v. Miller, 52 Abs 347, but in this case the demurrer was sustained and the action dismissed. The appeal was from the order [85]*85dismissing the action and not from the ruling on the demurrer. The motion to dismiss will be sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.E.2d 293, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 84, 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greyhound-corp-v-coleman-ohioctapp-1951.