Greybear v. State
This text of 2014 ND 218 (Greybear v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 218
Lyndon Galen Greybear, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140137
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas R. Herman, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lee M. Grossman, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Leah J. Viste, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Greybear v. State
[¶1] Lyndon Greybear appeals a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Greybear claims he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel and the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Greybear’s application for post-
conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greybear-v-state-nd-2014.