Grey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grey v. State

110 So. 3d 964, 2013 WL 1315964, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5362

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 3, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-3286

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 3d 964 (Grey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grey v. State, 110 So. 3d 964, 2013 WL 1315964, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is appellant’s second post-conviction appeal challenging his sentence as outside the sentencing guidelines when the guidelines do not apply. Because appellant has filed successive motions and appeals raising or attempting to re-litigate meritless claims, he is cautioned that filing any further frivolous pleadings may result in the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se [965]*965filings. See State v. Spencer; 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

POLEN, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is appellant’s second post-conviction appeal challenging his sentence as outside the sentencing guidelines when the guidelines do not apply. Because appellant has filed successive motions and appeals raising or attempting to re-litigate meritless claims, he is cautioned that filing any further frivolous pleadings may result in the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se [965]*965filings. See State v. Spencer; 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.

POLEN, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 3d 964, 2013 WL 1315964, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grey-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack