Grewe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grewe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

804 S.W.2d 797, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 1990·No. No. 58554·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. We hold that the trial court correctly found that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that respondent’s request for an independent medical exam was reasonable. Thus, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for respondent. An extended opinion would not have precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. We hold that the trial court correctly found that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that respondent’s request for an independent medical exam was reasonable. Thus, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for respondent. An extended opinion would not have precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Grewe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 804 S.W.2d 797, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

804 S.W.2d 797 (Grewe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.