Grevious v. Commonwealth Department of Welfare

974 A.2d 1166
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 20, 2009·No. 35 EAP 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2009, as this Court finds the facts as pled in Appellant’s Amended Petition for Review, and all reasonable inferences taken therefrom, sufficiently establish a prima facie case for recovery under the Whistleblower Law, 43 P.S. §§ 1421, et seq., the Order of the Commonwealth Court sustaining the Department of Public Welfare’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1028(a)(4), is REVERSED. McNeil v. Jordan, 586 Pa. 413, 894 A.2d 1260, 1274 (2006) (“In evaluating a demurrer, a court must accept as true all well-pleaded facts and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom, and determine with certainty that no recovery is possible.”). The case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court for proceedings not inconsistent with this Order. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice EAKIN dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grevious v. Commonwealth Department of Welfare, 974 A.2d 1166 (Pa. 2009).

974 A.2d 1166 (Grevious v. Commonwealth Department of Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeil v. Jordan
894 A.2d 1260 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)