Greve v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad

25 Minn. 327, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 63
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 10, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 25 Minn. 327 (Greve v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greve v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad, 25 Minn. 327, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 63 (Mich. 1878).

Opinion

By the Court.

Motion to strike cause from calendar, for insufficiency of notice of argument. The notice was served September 21st, for the term commencing October 1st. The rule (8) requires a notice of at least ten days before the first day of the term. To make at least ten days, neither the day [328]*328on which the notice is served, nor the first day, can be counted. The notice was insufficient, and the cause is struck from the calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. St. George v. Justice Court
257 P. 1034 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Village of Excelsior v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co.
120 N.W. 526 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)
State ex rel. Currie v. Weld
40 N.W. 561 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Minn. 327, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greve-v-st-paul-stillwater-taylors-falls-railroad-minn-1878.