Grethen v. Clarke

672 F. App'x 300
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 5, 2017·No. No. 16-6206·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Grethen appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for the appointment of counsel, granting a motion for sanctions and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grethen v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00416-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2015 & Feb. 11, 2016). We deny Grethen’s motion for the appointment of counsel as well as his motions for a transfer to Augusta Correctional Center and his motion regarding the storage of his legal materials. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grethen v. Clarke, 672 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2017).

672 F. App'x 300 (Grethen v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penna v. United States
Federal Claims, 2021