Gress v. State

85 So. 3d 1185, 2012 WL 1364997, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6190
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2012·No. 5D10-3884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the judgments and sentences she received for the offenses of culpable negligence and two counts of neglect of a child causing great bodily harm, permanent disfigurement, or permanent disability. The State properly concedes that the conviction for culpable negligence is a double jeopardy violation because it arose from the same criminal episode, involving the same victim, and was a lesser offense subsumed by a greater offense. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence for culpable negligence. In all other respects, we affirm.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gress v. State, 85 So. 3d 1185, 2012 WL 1364997, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6190 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

85 So. 3d 1185 (Gress v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hare v. State
114 So. 3d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)